• Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • default color
  • red color
  • green color

Got Good Credit ?

Sunday
May 20th
FireBoard
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
rank and file Public Service Strike Vote Question (Wayne?) (0 viewing) 
Go to bottom Post Reply Favoured: 0
TOPIC: rank and file Public Service Strike Vote Question (Wayne?)
#7
Wayne St.Onge (Visitor)
Click here to see the profile of this user
Birthdate:
rank and file Public Service Strike Vote Question (Wayne?)  
you ballot! I hope this is just anouth of those rumors. David.
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#8
Darryl Harding (Visitor)
Click here to see the profile of this user
Birthdate:
rank and file Public Service Strike Vote Question (Wayne?)  
Hi David. I think it's safe to say all of us are happy to be back to work.  My impression is that most of us are displeased with the circumstances of our pressured return.  I must choose my words carefully, as semantic interpretations vary!   I don't recall the exact numbers in my Local, but I think it was roughly 40 out of 50 members voted; 80% turnout.  I find it unthinkable that there would only be a 24% turnout as relayed by this person, but I am not in a position to refute it.  Regardless, I'm confident it would be the rare exception compared to most, if not all, other Locals. There are certainly those who are unable to vote for certain reasons. They may have grounds to complain.  Those who choose not to vote, have no grounds to complain; as in choosing not to hear the complete details of a negotiating teams recommendation. We must also keep in mind that the preference those who could not, or chose not to, vote, cannot be assumed to have be either for or against the strike. I don't think it's unfair of negotiating teams to delay voting until explanations are complete.  I would suggest it's responsible behaviour. In summary, I don't think the numbers this person has provided in any way reflect the numbers provincially.  Is there an argument to be made to allow those to vote who have made up their mind regardless of what they will hear from the teams?  Certainly, but I suspect those of such a mind are in the extreme minority.  I think there was 1 person at my meeting who, half way through, asked to vote because they had to leave due to family commitments. They were permitted. Sincerely, Wayne David < This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it wrote in message This is a general question/comment that I was hoping someone would verify or correct.  (Wayne St. Onge maybe?) I returned today to my normal workplace in a government office.  I was told by a union member who had been on the picket line that they were very happy to be back at work.  In our discussion she pointed out that the 91% in favour vote was actually only 91% of the 24% who voted (or was that 21 or 29%??) ... anyway... she said that the union forced members to sit through a 2-hour presentation prior to letting anyone vote... and thus discouraged many people from voting. Is this true?  If so, I find that very unfair!! Imagine if you went to vote in the next election you were forced to sit through a 2-hour debate on the political issues before being allowed to cast you ballot! I hope this is just anouth of those rumors. David.
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#9
Steve (Visitor)
Click here to see the profile of this user
Birthdate:
rank and file Public Service Strike Vote Question (Wayne?)  
many people from voting. Is this true?  If so, I find that very unfair!! Imagine if you went to vote in the next election you were forced to sit through a 2-hour debate on the political issues before being allowed to cast you ballot! I hope this is just anouth of those rumors. David.
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#10
Steve (Visitor)
Click here to see the profile of this user
Birthdate:
rank and file Public Service Strike Vote Question (Wayne?)  
many people from voting. Is this true?  If so, I find that very unfair!! Imagine if you went to vote in the next election you were forced to sit through a 2-hour debate on the political issues before being allowed to cast you ballot! I hope this is just anouth of those rumors. David.
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#11
Darryl Harding (Visitor)
Click here to see the profile of this user
Birthdate:
rank and file Public Service Strike Vote Question (Wayne?)  
Hi David. I think it's safe to say all of us are happy to be back to work.  My impression is that most of us are displeased with the circumstances of our pressured return.  I must choose my words carefully, as semantic interpretations vary!   I don't recall the exact numbers in my Local, but I think it was roughly 40 out of 50 members voted; 80% turnout.  I find it unthinkable that there would only be a 24% turnout as relayed by this person, but I am not in a position to refute it.  Regardless, I'm confident it would be the rare exception compared to most, if not all, other Locals. There are certainly those who are unable to vote for certain reasons. They may have grounds to complain.  Those who choose not to vote, have no grounds to complain; as in choosing not to hear the complete details of a negotiating teams recommendation. We must also keep in mind that the preference those who could not, or chose not to, vote, cannot be assumed to have be either for or against the strike. I don't think it's unfair of negotiating teams to delay voting until explanations are complete.  I would suggest it's responsible behaviour. In summary, I don't think the numbers this person has provided in any way reflect the numbers provincially.  Is there an argument to be made to allow those to vote who have made up their mind regardless of what they will hear from the teams?  Certainly, but I suspect those of such a mind are in the extreme minority.  I think there was 1 person at my meeting who, half way through, asked to vote because they had to leave due to family commitments. They were permitted. Sincerely, Wayne David < This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it wrote in message This is a general question/comment that I was hoping someone would verify or correct.  (Wayne St. Onge maybe?) I returned today to my normal workplace in a government office.  I was told by a union member who had been on the picket line that they were very happy to be back at work.  In our discussion she pointed out that the 91% in favour vote was actually only 91% of the 24% who voted (or was that 21 or 29%??) ... anyway... she said that the union forced members to sit through a 2-hour presentation prior to letting anyone vote... and thus discouraged many people from voting. Is this true?  If so, I find that very unfair!! Imagine if you went to vote in the next election you were forced to sit through a 2-hour debate on the political issues before being allowed to cast you ballot! I hope this is just anouth of those rumors. David.
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#12
Smoke286 (Visitor)
Click here to see the profile of this user
Birthdate:
rank and file Public Service Strike Vote Question (Wayne?)  
you ballot! I hope this is just anouth of those rumors. David.
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Go to top Post Reply
Powered by FireBoardget the latest posts directly to your desktop
 

Short News

Cache Directory Unwriteable


The record number of countries will be penalized for an excessive deficit

Tackling the crisis in the States absorbs a quantity of waagen industriewaagen previews.elegant-auto.co.uk furniture.bblog.pl money that the situation in the budgets of countries is becoming increasingly tense. Sometimes you can even the impression that the authorities of the country completely lost control of the state of equilibrium in the public hand. Excessive deficit begins to consume more and more countries from the EU, the EC decided to take the steps to run against some of the excessive Mehrgenerationenhaus Tecom Villas real estate montenegro deficit procedure.

Global economic crisis is increasingly beginning to impress their niechlubne influenced the condition of the public finance sector in the EU. The result is a deepening gap between the level of income and expenditure budgets of the member countries, and consequently further Dubai Star Tower logotype POKEMON increase their current debt.

Today the governments of many EU countries are becoming major problems in order to maintain the budget deficit in the toes and thus does not exceed the permissible limit of 3 percent. GDP, which was provided for in the Treaty of previews.tourist-car.co.uk Villa For Rent In The World verizon prepaid Maastricht. Unfortunately, it probably will be few of them. Do not respect the EU standards in this matter at the initial stage, may threaten the imposition of financial sanctions on the country, and then complete with money coming mostly from EU funds. NB the occurrence of excessive deficits in the Member States of the Community also raises issues associated with maintaining the overall level of its stability, and thus the credibility and in the designer shoes Breitling imitation watches usedbmwsite.co.uk international arena.


<1bd54ed98c14cd47be7a4e2c5b711d91>-ERRORnowritablePlik nie ma ustawionych praw do zapisu Pozycjonowanie 902 903