|
|
|
evidence for big foot Noahs Flood - yet more:
|
|
|
Let's reduce your example and you tell me if I am correct: You assert that X + Y = A + B _base_d on C. Assume Z + D = E. Assume Z - Y = G. Ergo, E + G = H. This makes no sense. It says, in essence, that me with evidence but without an understanding of the evidence constitutes a logical fallicy. This is patently illogical. E + G can only = H if E + G = Y. But, as clearly shown in your own assumption, Z - Y = G. Sue, pointing out that jimamy is backing himself into a corner In your mind. By the way, I noticed you failed to address the issue again. jimamy, pointing out that Sue is in over her head.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
evidence for big foot Noahs Flood - yet more:
|
|
|
As I said, the burden of proof in this discussion is on you since you are the one who made the claim that the info was a valid counter argument. It's like arguing with a creationist! Learn a little before you run off at the key board. All you have to do is offer a simple retraction and admit that you don't know that the Mayans here in America didn't notice it, the Incas didn't notice it, the Aztecs didn't notice it, and strangest of all, the Egyptians, which were Right Next Door didn't even take note of it, or mention it anywhere. All this because you are not sure. You may be right but you lack the evidence to make such a claim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
evidence for big foot Noahs Flood - yet more:
|
|
|
That is all I have been looking for, is evidence, not gut feelings. The only concrete responses I've heard so far deal with annual sediment deposits in certain lakes that have an annual track record going back 40,000 years and the lack of evidence for the movement of the Greenland Ice sheet in the last 100,000 years. Isn't that enough?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
evidence for big foot Noahs Flood - yet more:
|
|
|
No flood myths dating 2700 BCE. YOu are throwing in a mishmash of flood myths from who knows when. Anyone who attaches a date to a myth is a fool. Myths are built over time, by repeated retelling, with changes coming with each retelling. That's one reason why it is a bad idea to use myth as an indication of ancient history.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
evidence for big foot Noahs Flood - yet more:
|
|
|
That is all I have been looking for, is evidence, not gut feelings. The only concrete responses I've heard so far deal with annual sediment deposits in certain lakes that have an annual track record going back 40,000 years and the lack of evidence for the movement of the Greenland Ice sheet in the last 100,000 years. Isn't that enough? Sure. But that is not the point of an academic argument. - Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
evidence for big foot Noahs Flood - yet more:
|
|
|
My determination is not to remain stubbornly with my ideas but I'll leave them and go over to others as soon as I am shown plausible reason which I can grasp. - Antony Leeuwenhoek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|