• Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • default color
  • red color
  • green color

Got Good Credit ?

Wednesday
Sep 08th
FireBoard
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
evidence for big foot Noahs Flood - yet more: (0 viewing) 
Go to bottom Post Reply Favoured: 0
TOPIC: evidence for big foot Noahs Flood - yet more:
#41409
R Bishop (Visitor)
Click here to see the profile of this user
Birthdate:
evidence for big foot Noahs Flood - yet more:  
Let's reduce your example and you tell me if I am correct:  You assert that X + Y = A + B _base_d on C.  Assume Z + D = E.  Assume Z - Y = G. Ergo, E + G = H.  This makes no sense.  It says, in essence, that me with evidence but without an understanding of the evidence constitutes a logical fallicy.  This is patently illogical.  E + G can only = H if E + G = Y.  But, as clearly shown in your own assumption, Z - Y = G. Sue, pointing out that jimamy is backing himself into a corner In your mind.  By the way, I noticed you failed to address the issue again.   jimamy, pointing out that Sue is in over her head. Never trust anything that thinks for itself, if you can't see where it keeps its brain. J K Rowlings
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#41410
R Bishop (Visitor)
Click here to see the profile of this user
Birthdate:
evidence for big foot Noahs Flood - yet more:  
it, the Incas didn't notice it, the Aztecs didn't notice it, and strangest of all, the Egyptians, which were Right Next Door didn't even take note of it, or mention it anywhere.  And they left a very large volume of writings from much earlier than 2800 BCE.   In fact, you have no idea whether the Mayans here in America noticed it.  You have no idea whether the Incas noticed it.  You have no idea whether the Aztecs noticed it.  And you you have no idea whether the Egyptians noticed it.  Yet, lacking the vital evidence, you make these conclusions. I wouldn't be so sure of this. If not, then pony up! As I said, the burden of proof in this discussion is on you since you are the one who made the claim that the info was a valid counter argument. It's like arguing with a creationist!   Learn a little before you run off at the key board.  All you have to do is offer a simple retraction and admit that you don't know that the  Mayans here in America didn't notice it, the Incas didn't notice it, the Aztecs didn't notice it, and strangest of all, the Egyptians, which were Right Next Door didn't even take note of it, or mention it anywhere.  All this because you are not sure.  You may be right but you lack the evidence to make such a claim. You have given no evidence that they DID notice a flood.  Which is your position.  Support it.   Sue Never trust anything that thinks for itself, if you can't see where it keeps its brain. J K Rowlings
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#41411
R Bishop (Visitor)
Click here to see the profile of this user
Birthdate:
evidence for big foot Noahs Flood - yet more:  
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#41412
R Bishop (Visitor)
Click here to see the profile of this user
Birthdate:
evidence for big foot Noahs Flood - yet more:  
snip Nope.  I made the statement that there isn't any 2700 BCE flood Inca legend. Wrong Sue.  You said: Of course, the Mayans here in America didn't notice it, the Incas didn't notice it, the Aztecs didn't notice it, and strangest of all, the Egyptians, which were Right Next Door didn't even take note of it, or mention it anywhere.  And they left a very large volume of writings from much earlier than 2800 BCE. To say something did not occur is an affirmative proposition.  The burden is on you to back it up.  You failed to prove that the flood myths of the cultures demonstrate that they failed to notice the 2800 BCE flood.  Absent evidence of when those flood myths occured, you can never say they did not notice the floods or when they occured. What bunk..A neutral  position assumes that nothing specific happens unless we have a reason to think so Otherwise every piece of unevidenced claptrap that couldn`t be utterly disproved would have equal standing to evidenced beliefs In that case mad conjecture like, champion the wonderhorse created the universe would have equal standing to commonly accepted notions, such as, the world is sperical Plainly this isn`t the case..The burden is on you to show its even worth considering as a hypothesis Exactly.  And he's becoming more and more ridiculous as he thrashes around, slaughtering logic every post he makes. Sue Never trust anything that thinks for itself, if you can't see where it keeps its brain. J K Rowlings
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#41413
R Bishop (Visitor)
Click here to see the profile of this user
Birthdate:
evidence for big foot Noahs Flood - yet more:  
(the absence of evidence/evidence of absence problem ) Sigh.  Let's take this in yet another direction.   I say Big Foot doesn't exist.   You say, yes he does, here's evidence he does exist.  The evidence you post is very vague and may or may not apply to the existance of Big Foot. You can claim all you wish that *MY* argument is invalid because I don't know whether there is a Big Foot or not.  The burden is not on me.  I say the evidence doesn't exist.  You have to prove it DOES!!!! Five quatloos he doesn't address this.  Either that, or he will try his best to argue that's not what I meant when I said Big Foot Doesn't Exist.   Sue, with deep amusement at the maneuverings Never trust anything that thinks for itself, if you can't see where it keeps its brain. J K Rowlings
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#41414
Sam Lewis (Visitor)
Click here to see the profile of this user
Birthdate:
evidence for big foot Noahs Flood - yet more:  
than a day. Part of that *could* be explained by the reletive elevation of the respective cultures.  It might take 22 years for water to recede along pre-existing coast-lines or for folks on flat, low-lying interiors. Those who lived in the center of high continents (Rocky Mountains) might walk back down with the water after a day. But meanwhile the low-lying cultures are under water for 22 years, after which they develop the myth? Perhaps they had diving bells? What people are we talking about? In the Genesis flood everyone died but Noah and his family.
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Go to top Post Reply
Powered by FireBoardget the latest posts directly to your desktop
 

Short News

Cache Directory Unwriteable


The record number of countries will be penalized for an excessive deficit

Tackling the crisis in the States absorbs a quantity of motor.world-auto.co.uk remortgage help remortgage loan money that the situation in the budgets of countries is becoming increasingly tense. Sometimes you can even the impression that the authorities of the country completely lost control of the state of equilibrium in the public hand. Excessive deficit begins to consume more and more countries from the EU, the EC decided to take the steps to run against some of the excessive lieferanten polen Online printing Jewellery deficit procedure.

Global economic crisis is increasingly beginning to impress their niechlubne influenced the condition of the public finance sector in the EU. The result is a deepening gap between the level of income and expenditure budgets of the member countries, and consequently further Otimizaçao de sites no Google www.car-supermarket.org.uk Files Downloads increase their current debt.

Today the governments of many EU countries are becoming major problems in order to maintain the budget deficit in the toes and thus does not exceed the permissible limit of 3 percent. GDP, which was provided for in the Treaty of advice credit Used auto - reviews www.carforyou.org.uk Maastricht. Unfortunately, it probably will be few of them. Do not respect the EU standards in this matter at the initial stage, may threaten the imposition of financial sanctions on the country, and then complete with money coming mostly from EU funds. NB the occurrence of excessive deficits in the Member States of the Community also raises issues associated with maintaining the overall level of its stability, and thus the credibility and in the Tennis Live Scores Streaming cheap web hosting bílé víno international arena.


Dragon Ball
Dragon Ball
www.kreskowka.pl
kredyty
kredyty
moj-bank.com
Zasłony
Multi Color - zasłony, firany
www.multicol.net
sportowy
sportowy
www.sportowy.glade.…
hologramy

www.vera.com.pl
Pozycjonowanie Sprzet agd i rtv noclegi wroclaw centrum taniec dla narzeczonych Gąski ławka prosta wolnostojąca live news dt news online fantasy games india group tours car comapnies